Which imaging modalities are most effective for confirming a diagnosis of avascular necrosis in primary care?

Guideline-aligned answer with reasoning, red flags and references. Clinically reviewed by Dr Kola Tytler MBBS CertHE MBA MRCGP.

Posted: 22 August 2025Updated: 22 August 2025 Guideline-Aligned (High Confidence) Clinically Reviewed
Dr Kola Tytler MBBS CertHE MBA MRCGPClinical Lead • iatroX

For confirming a diagnosis of avascular necrosis (AVN), particularly in primary care where initial assessment and referral are key, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is considered the most sensitive and specific imaging modality . MRI can detect avascular necrosis in its early stages, often before changes are visible on plain radiographs . While plain radiographs are frequently the initial imaging investigation for joint pain, they have limited sensitivity for early AVN . Computed Tomography (CT) scans can also be used, particularly for assessing the extent of bone destruction and for surgical planning, and are relevant in specific types of osteonecrosis such as medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw . However, for early diagnosis and confirmation, MRI remains superior .

Educational content only. Always verify information and use clinical judgement.