Which laboratory tests are most useful for confirming Zika virus infection in symptomatic patients?

Guideline-aligned answer with reasoning, red flags and references. Clinically reviewed by Dr Kola Tytler MBBS CertHE MBA MRCGP.

Posted: 14 August 2025Updated: 14 August 2025 Guideline-Aligned (High Confidence) Clinically Reviewed
Dr Kola Tytler MBBS CertHE MBA MRCGPClinical Lead • iatroX

The most useful laboratory tests for confirming Zika virus infection in symptomatic patients are molecular detection by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and serological testing for Zika virus-specific IgM antibodies. RT-PCR performed on serum or urine samples within the first week of symptom onset is the preferred diagnostic method due to its high specificity and ability to detect viral RNA during the acute phase of infection . If RT-PCR is negative or the patient presents later than 7 days after symptom onset, serological testing for Zika virus-specific IgM antibodies can be used to support diagnosis, although cross-reactivity with other flaviviruses such as dengue virus may complicate interpretation . Confirmatory testing with plaque reduction neutralization tests (PRNT) may be necessary to distinguish Zika virus infection from related flavivirus infections in endemic areas .

In summary, RT-PCR is the frontline test for symptomatic patients early in illness, followed by IgM serology and confirmatory neutralization assays if needed.

Educational content only. Always verify information and use clinical judgement.