OpenEvidence vs Glass Health (2025): The Answer Engine vs The Reasoning Engine
At a Glance
Who is it for?
OpenEvidence:General Clinicians
Glass Health:Diagnosticians / Students
Why choose OpenEvidence?
- **Citations**: Every sentence is footnoted to a paper/guideline.
- **Speed**: Direct answers to 'How do I treat X?'.
- **Sources**: Scans the open medical web (US-centric).
Why choose Glass Health?
- **Structure**: Outputs structured differentials (Common, Dangerous, Rare).
- **Schemas**: Visual approach to problem representation.
- **Education**: Better for learning *how* to diagnose.
Feature Comparison
| Capability | OpenEvidence | Glass Health |
|---|---|---|
| Focus | Management / Treatment | Diagnosis / Differential |
| Style | Fact Retrieval | Case Simulation |
In-Depth Analysis
Overview
OpenEvidence is like a super-powered search engine. You ask it a question, and it finds the answer in the literature.
Glass Health is like a super-powered whiteboard. You tell it a case, and it helps you map out the possibilities and structure your thinking.
Looking for a faster way?
While OpenEvidence and Glass Health are powerful tools, iatroX offers a free, AI-driven alternative focused specifically on rapid UK guideline retrieval and exam prep.
Use-Cases
Management of COPD
When to choose OpenEvidence
- **Winner.** Returns the treatment protocol.
When to choose Glass Health
- Focuses more on diagnosing the breathlessness.
Undifferentiated Abdo Pain
When to choose OpenEvidence
- Good list, but less structured.
When to choose Glass Health
- **Winner.** Builds a logical framework for the workup.