Guidelines.co.uk vs SIGN Guidelines (2025): The Summary vs The Source
At a Glance
Who is it for?
Guidelines.co.uk:Busy Clinicians
SIGN Guidelines:Scottish NHS / Academics
Why choose Guidelines.co.uk?
- **Speed**: Summarises the key points from SIGN, NICE, and others.
- **Format**: Web-friendly, easy to read on mobile.
- **Variety**: A one-stop-shop for guidelines from multiple bodies.
Why choose SIGN Guidelines?
- **Authority**: The Gold Standard for evidence-based medicine in Scotland.
- **Rigour**: Explicit grading of evidence quality (A, B, C, D).
- **Detail**: Comprehensive background and methodology.
Feature Comparison
| Capability | Guidelines.co.uk | SIGN Guidelines |
|---|---|---|
| Depth | Low (Key Points) | High (Full Text) |
| Region | UK Wide | Scotland |
In-Depth Analysis
Overview
SIGN writes the guideline; Guidelines.co.uk summarises it. If you work in Scotland, you follow SIGN, but you probably use the summaries on Guidelines.co.uk (or the SIGN app) for day-to-day reference.
Looking for a faster way?
While Guidelines.co.uk and SIGN Guidelines are powerful tools, iatroX offers a free, AI-driven alternative focused specifically on rapid UK guideline retrieval and exam prep.
Use-Cases
Quick Check during Clinic
When to choose Guidelines.co.uk
- **Winner.** rapid lookup of the flowchart.
When to choose SIGN Guidelines
- Scanning a 50-page PDF is too slow.
Academic Review / Audit
When to choose Guidelines.co.uk
- Insufficient detail.
When to choose SIGN Guidelines
- **Winner.** The definitive source.