AMBOSS vs BMJ Best Practice (2025): The Knowledge Base vs The Workflow

Last reviewed: 2025-12-19 · Reviewed by

At a Glance

Who is it for?

AMBOSS:Doctors / Students

BMJ Best Practice:Clinicians

Why choose AMBOSS?

  • **Depth**: Detailed articles including pathophysiology.
  • **Search**: Very fast, granular search (finds specific symptoms).
  • **Education**: Integrated Q-bank mode overlay.

Why choose BMJ Best Practice?

  • **Workflow**: structured 'Diagnosis -> Management -> Follow Up'.
  • **Guidelines**: Aligned with UK/International standards.
  • **Comorbidities**: Unique tool for treating patients with multiple diseases.

Feature Comparison

CapabilityAMBOSSBMJ Best Practice
FormatWiki / ArticleAlgorithm / Step-by-step
FocusInformationAction

In-Depth Analysis

Overview

AMBOSS is built like a library—amazing for research and answering "why". BMJ Best Practice is built like a cockpit—amazing for checklists and answering "what next".

Looking for a faster way?

While AMBOSS and BMJ Best Practice are powerful tools, iatroX offers a free, AI-driven alternative focused specifically on rapid UK guideline retrieval and exam prep.

Try iatroX Free

Use-Cases

Why does this patient have hypokalaemia?

When to choose AMBOSS

  • **Winner.** Great differential diagnosis section.

When to choose BMJ Best Practice

  • Harder to use for reverse-lookup.

How do I treat this confirmed PE?

When to choose AMBOSS

  • Good detail.

When to choose BMJ Best Practice

  • **Winner.** Clear step-by-step orders.