the knowledge platform

wrong-answer review: the 5-minute protocol

stop 'reading explanations'. extract a decision rule, build one retrieval prompt, and schedule the next hit.

Your score is not primarily determined by how many questions you do. It’s determined by how well you convert mistakes into durable rules. The highest-leverage habit in exam prep is a short, repeatable post-question protocol you can run hundreds of times without friction.

Design principle

Retrieval (attempting an answer) followed by feedback and a later re-attempt produces stronger retention than passive review. Your job is to engineer that loop quickly.
1

Step 1 — Label the miss (10 seconds)

Pick one label: Knowledge gap / Misread stem / Confused similar options / Overthought / Timing. One label only.
2

Step 2 — Extract the decision rule (60 seconds)

Write one sentence: 'If X, the best next step is Y because Z.' Keep it exam-shaped.
3

Step 3 — Create one retrieval prompt (90 seconds)

Turn the rule into a question. Example: 'In a patient with X and Y, what is the first-line next step?'
4

Step 4 — Add one trap-avoidance line (30 seconds)

Add: 'Do NOT choose A when…' or 'Differentiate from B by…'. This trains discrimination.
5

Step 5 — Schedule the next hit (30 seconds)

Ensure the rule will be retrieved again (flashcard / tagged note / error log). The value is in the future re-attempt, not the immediate insight.
6

Step 6 — Move on (0 seconds)

Do not reread the whole explanation. If you need a longer deep-dive, flag it for a separate session. Keep the loop fast.

Common failure mode

‘Understanding’ the explanation and feeling satisfied — then never retrieving it again. Insight without re-retrieval is entertainment, not learning.
SourceRoediger & Karpicke (2006) — Testing improves long-term retention (PubMed)
Open Link
SourceDunlosky et al. (2013) — High-utility techniques: practice testing + distributed practice
Open Link