the knowledge platform

the only error log that actually works: a 30-item, weekly retest system

a minimal, high-leverage error log that compounds: prompts, spaced retesting, and ruthless deletion once automatic.

Most ‘error logs’ fail because they become a second notebook. The goal is not record-keeping. The goal is behavioural change: you stop making the same mistakes. The solution is a small, aggressively pruned list that you retest weekly until errors vanish.

The rule: small enough to finish weekly

If you can’t retest your error log in one sitting every week, it is not an error log — it is a guilt document. Keep it small (30 items is ideal) and delete relentlessly once automatic.

The Bottom Line

  • Max 30 active items. Anything bigger is too broad or too undisciplined.
  • Each item is a 10-second prompt with a clear cue and action.
  • Weekly retest + delete what’s now automatic.
1

Step 1 — Capture only high-value errors

Include: thresholds, contraindications, escalation triggers, common discriminators, and repeated misreads. Do not include low-yield trivia.
2

Step 2 — Standardise the format

Format: Cue → Decision → Action. Example: “AF + CHA2DS2-VASc X → anticoagulate → choose agent with contraindications in mind.”
3

Step 3 — Add a ‘why you missed it’ tag

Knowledge / misread / threshold / timing / bias. This helps you design the *next* week’s training rather than repeating the same approach.
4

Step 4 — Retest weekly (single sitting)

Set a 20–30 minute timer. Retest all items closed-book. Any item answered instantly gets deleted. Ambers stay. Reds get rewritten narrower.
5

Step 5 — Monthly reset

Once per month, wipe the list down to only stubborn Reds. This keeps the system lean and prevents ‘collection mode’.
Practice

Test your knowledge

Apply this concept immediately with a high-yield question block from the iatroX Q-Bank.

Generate Questions
SourceRoediger & Karpicke (2006): Testing effect (PubMed)
Open Link
SourceCepeda et al. (2006): Spacing effect meta-analysis (PubMed)
Open Link