the knowledge platform

nice cks access, linking, and “safe citation” in notes (non-clinical)

where cks sits in nhs access reality, how to link to it cleanly, and how to document use without over-claiming or copying content.

The Bottom Line

  • CKS is open access; the practical benefit is that you can link directly to topic pages for fast team standardisation.
  • “Safe citation” means: reference that you consulted CKS and capture your clinical reasoning—avoid copying large blocks of text.
  • If you want defensibility, record the date checked and (where relevant) the topic update log.

Access reality (what clinicians actually need to know)

Clinicians don’t adopt tools because they are “good”; they adopt tools because they are accessible. CKS is openly available and therefore behaves like infrastructure: it can become a default reference point across a team without logins, subscriptions, or vendor friction.

How to cite CKS without over-claiming (documentation approach)

1

1) Cite the source + date checked

Example: “Reviewed NICE CKS (topic: X), checked 30 Jan 2026.”
2

2) Add a one-sentence rationale (your reasoning)

Your note should stand on your reasoning, not on copying guidance. Capture the “why” that applied to this patient/context.
3

3) If recency matters: include update-log confirmation

When appropriate, add “CKS update log reviewed; no major changes noted” (or the opposite).

The win

You standardise decisions, reduce searching, and improve defensibility—without building a new bureaucracy.
SourceNHS Learning Hub — NICE CKS listing (notes open access)
Open Link
SourceNICE CKS — About (official)
Open Link

Official Sources

NHS Learning Hub — NICE CKS
NICE CKS — About
NICE CKS — Homepage